Hidden Passions & Lofty Aspirations
Shaykh Taj ad-Din Abu al-Fadhl Ahmad ibn Muhammad ibn ‘Atha’illah
as-Sakandari, author of the celebrated al-Hikam al-‘Atha’iyyah, said, “Your
desire for isolation even though Allah has Put you in the world to gain a
living is a hidden passion. And your
desire to gain a living in the world even though Allah has Put you in isolation
is a comedown from lofty aspiration.”
This aphorism refuses the comfortable binary. Retreat is not automatically holy, and work
is not automatically profane. The
question that actually matters is whether the position you occupy matches the
position Allah has placed you in, not which position happens to feel more
spiritual on the day.
The First Failure: Mistaking Escapism for
Piety
A person with dependents, debts, and a livelihood to
build, who dreams constantly of withdrawing from the world into contemplative
solitude, is not experiencing elevated spirituality. Shaykh ibn ‘Atha’illah called this a hidden
passion. The desire disguises itself as
devotion while functioning as avoidance.
This is not a medieval problem.
It is the entire premise of a considerable slice of contemporary “spiritual”
content, where quitting one’s obligations, moving off-grid, and adopting the
aesthetic of monastic simplicity gets marketed as enlightenment, while the
mortgage, the ageing parents, and the responsibilities left behind get quietly
edited out of the narrative. The romance
of isolation photographs well. It does
not discharge a single one of the duties Allah has Assigned.
The Second Failure: Mistaking Diligence for
Obedience
The reverse case gets no sympathy in the modern
discourse at all, because grinding away at a career looks virtuous by
default. Shaykh ibn ‘Atha’illah said
otherwise. A person whom Allah has Placed
into isolation, whether through illness, circumstance, or a clear inward
calling toward withdrawal and reflection, who nonetheless forces himself back
into the marketplace out of habit, ego, or fear of appearing unproductive, has
suffered what the Shaykh calls a comedown from lofty aspiration. He has traded a real, higher station for the
comfort of looking busy. Modern work
culture rewards exactly this trade every single day, and calls it commitment.
The Real Anecdote Worth Knowing
Imam Abu Hamid Muhammad ibn Muhammad al-Ghazali held
one of the most prestigious teaching positions in the Islamic world, the
professorship at the Nizhamiyyah madrasah in Baghdad, when in 1095 CE he
underwent a documented spiritual and psychological crisis so severe it left him
physically unable to speak. He abandoned
the post, left his fame and his income behind, and spent roughly a decade in
retreat and travel, an isolation that produced the Ihya’ ‘Ulum ad-Din,
one of the most consequential works in Islamic intellectual history. He did not treat that retreat as a permanent
escape from obligation, romanticised for its own sake. When the period of isolation had done its
work, he returned to teaching. He read
correctly, at two different points in his life, which position Allah had Placed
him in, and he did not confuse either position with the other.
That discernment, not the retreat and not the return
in isolation, is the actual lesson.
Modern spirituality wants a slogan: retreat is authentic, hustle is
authentic, whichever sells better this quarter.
Shaykh ibn ‘Atha’illah offered something harder and more honest. Neither state carries inherent virtue. The only question worth asking is where you
have actually been placed, and whether your desires are leading you toward that
place or away from it.

Comments
Post a Comment
Thank you for taking the time to share our thoughts. Once approved, your comments will be posted.