A Scholar’s Second Period of Heresy
بِسۡمِ
ٱللهِ ٱلرَّحۡمَـٰنِ ٱلرَّحِيمِ
In 705 CE, Shaykh
Taqi’ ad-Din Ahmad ibn ‘Abd al-Halim ibn Taymiyyah (r.a.) was summoned
by the authorities again in to answer for his heretical ‘Aqidah
al-Wasithiyyah. He spent the next
several years in and out of jail or defending himself from various “abhorrent
charges”, according to Imam Shihab ad-Din Abu al-Fadhl Ahmad ibn ‘Ali ibn Hajr
al-‘Asqalani (r.a.). Because he
officially repented, his life was spared, although at one point, it was
officially announced in Damascus that, “Whoever follows the beliefs of ibn
Taymiyyah, his life and property are licit for seizure.”
These events instigated great dissension among the scholars in Damascus and Cairo and were detailed in Imam Taqi’ ad-Din Abu Bakr ibn Muhammad al-Hiswni’s (r.a.) Daf’ Shubah man Shabbaha wa Tamarrad wa Nasaba Dzalika ila as-Sayyid al-Jalil al-Imam Ahmad, “Repelling the Sophistries of the Rebel Who Likens Allah to Creation, Then Attributes This Doctrine to Imam Ahmad”. To clarify, “Imam Ahmad” here refers to Imam Ahmad ibn Muhammad ibn Hanbal (r.a.). This makes it explicit that the credal positions of Shaykh ibn Taymiyyah (r.a.) in his second period of heresy cannot be said to be the creed of Imam Ahmad (r.a.) and the wider Hanbali madzhab, or the Atsari creed.

Comments
Post a Comment
Thank you for taking the time to share our thoughts. Once approved, your comments will be posted.