The Detention of Zulfikar ibn Muhammad Sharif
بِسۡمِ ٱللهِ ٱلرَّحۡمَـٰنِ ٱلرَّحِيمِ
In a statement released
on the 29th July, 2016, Zulfikar ibn Muhammad Sharif was detained
under the Internal Security Act. My only
surprise is that it took so long for it to happen. I am quite certain that many wrote in about
our miscreant, and he was on the radar for some time.
The following is the relevant
portions of the MHA press release:
29th
July 2016
Detention
and Releases under the Internal Security Act
Order
of Detention Issued against Zulfikar Shariff
1. Zulfikar bin Mohamad Shariff (Zulfikar; Singaporean; aged
44), was arrested in Singapore and subsequently detained under the Internal
Security Act (ISA) in July 2016 for terrorism-related activities. Zulfikar had embarked on the path of radicalism
as early as 2001 after reading jihadi-related material. He was supportive of terrorist groups like
Al-Qaeda and the Jemaah Islamiyah, and advocated Muslims taking up arms in
Afghanistan after the 11th September 2001 terrorist attacks in the
US.
2. Zulfikar resettled his family in Australia in 2002. While in Australia, he continued to pursue
radical ideology by joining the hardline Hizbut Tahrir organisation. He was also influenced by the teachings of
radical ideologues like Anwar al-Awlaki. He established and maintained contact with
radical preachers in Australia and overseas, like Musa Cerantonio and Anjem
Choudary. Zulfikar has supported
terrorism and the terrorist group that calls itself the Islamic State in Iraq
and Syria (ISIS). He made numerous
Facebook postings glorifying and promoting ISIS and their violent actions,
while exploiting religion to legitimise the terrorist activities of ISIS. He has further exhorted Muslims to take up
arms and wage militant jihad in places like the Middle East, Palestinian
territories, Myanmar and the Philippines. To motivate Muslims to engage in armed jihad, Zulfikar proposed the creation of
a support system for the families of the fighters.
3. Zulfikar has made use of social media to propagate and
spread his radical messages. He
considered his propagation of radical material as a form of jihad, by way of creating awareness of
ISIS and promoting armed jihad. Zulfikar
has contributed to the radicalisation of at least two other Singaporeans. One of them was Muhammad Shamin bin Mohamed
Sidik (detained under the ISA for terrorism-related activities). The other was Mohamed Saiddhin bin Abdullah,
who was inspired by Zulfikar’s radical postings. This included a photograph of Zulfikar with
his children mimicking a pose commonly adopted by jihadi fighters, while
standing in front of a black flag that is commonly used by jihadi terrorist
groups.
4. Zulfikar admitted that besides his intention to promote ISIS
and armed jihad, he also wanted his
online followers to reject the Western secular democratic nation-state system
and instead establish an Islamic caliphate in its place, governed by shari’ah law. He believes that violence should be used to
achieve this goal if necessary. To this
end, Zulfikar had actively looked into holding training programmes aimed at
radicalising young Singaporeans so that they would be persuaded into joining
his extremist agenda. It was also for
the objective of realising the establishment of a global Islamic caliphate that
he set up an online group called “Al-Makhazin” in 2013, and other “Al-Makhazin”
Facebook platforms for Muslims to counter the Western media, while residing in
Australia. Zulfikar has admitted that he
had an ulterior motive for setting up a Facebook page called “Al-Makhazin
Singapore” which he used as a platform to agitate on Muslim issues in Singapore
and attack some Singaporean Muslims who did not share his views. His real agenda was in fact to provoke Muslims
in Singapore into pushing for the replacement of the democratic system with an
Islamic state in Singapore. He said that
he hid his ulterior motive from the Singaporean “Al-Makhazin Singapore”
members.
5. In view of the high level of the terrorism threat that
Singapore currently faces, and the global terrorism threat posed by ISIS,
Zulfikar’s promotion of violence and ISIS and his radicalising influence pose a
security threat to Singapore. At times
he has tried to hide his real motivations, by putting out moderate sounding
views. But in reality, he believes in
the use of violence to overthrow the democratic system of government, and the
imposition of an Islamic caliphate. He
continues to support ISIS, and wants Singaporeans to do the same. The Government takes a very serious view of
efforts to undermine Singapore’s constitutional democracy, and will take firm
and decisive action against any person who engages in such activities. He has been served with an Order of Detention
(OD) for a period of two years.
Restriction
Order issued against Mohamed Saiddhin bin Abdullah
6. Mohamed Saiddhin bin Abdullah (Saiddhin; Singaporean; aged
33), a radicalised businessman, was issued with a Restriction Order (RO) for a
period of two years in Jul 2016. He was
radicalised through perusing radical online material and radical influences. He identified Zulfikar bin Mohamad Shariff
whom he befriended online as the person who had influenced him to support ISIS.
Saiddhin had looked up to Zulfikar and
followed his postings; he was convinced by Zulfikar’s positive portrayal of
ISIS and later started re-posting Zulfikar’s postings on ISIS as a form of jihad, emulating Zulfikar. Saiddhin was so inspired by Zulfikar that he
even emulated Zulfikar by photographing himself adopting the common pose of
jihadi fighters while standing in front of an ISIS flag. He posted these photographs online as a show
of his solidarity with ISIS militants fighting in Syria and Iraq.
7. Saiddhin was issued with an RO to prevent him from becoming
further radicalised.
Re-Detention
of Fadil bin Abdul Hamid
8. Muhammad Fadil bin Abdul Hamid (Fadil; Singaporean; aged
27), was re-detained under the ISA for a period of two years in April 2016 as
he intended to join a terrorist group like ISIS, to engage in armed violence in
Syria. Fadil was previously detained
under the ISA from 2010 to 2012 when he was self-radicalised and had the
intention to engage in armed violence in Afghanistan. He was released from detention in 2012 and
placed on an RO.
9. Fadil had initially made some progress in reintegrating into
society. However, he later became
attracted to radical online material again, like teachings of radical
ideologues such as Anwar al-Awlaki and the propaganda of ISIS, and fell under its
influence. He became convinced that
partaking in the violence in Syria was “justifiable jihad” and harboured the
intention to fight alongside ISIS militants in Syria. He also reverted to the belief that militant
jihad was the easiest way to achieve martyrdom. He had to be detained to prevent him from
pursuing his violent agenda.
Restriction
Order issued against Self-radicalised Singaporean Youth
10. A 17-year-old male Singaporean, who
recently graduated from a madrasah,
was issued with an RO for a period of two years under the ISA in July 2016. Investigations showed that he had become
radicalised online after viewing pro-ISIS videos, websites and social media
material. He became convinced that ISIS’
violent actions were justified and harboured the intention to fight for ISIS in
Syria in the future where he was prepared to die a martyr. He had sought out other like-minded
individuals online, and also tried to influence his friends with his pro-ISIS
views. Despite their advice and
objections against ISIS, he persisted in his support for ISIS.
11. To prevent him from going further down
the path of radicalism and violence, he was issued with an RO.
A Detention Order means
that a person is detained under the Internal Security Act. A Detention Order is for a maximum period of
two years, but may be renewed an indefinite number of times. In contrast, a person issued with a
Restriction Order must abide by several conditions and restrictions. He is not permitted to change his residence or
employment, or travel out of Singapore, without the prior approval of the Director,
ISD. He may also not issue public
statements, address public meetings or print, distribute, contribute to any
publication, hold office in, or be a member of any organisation, association or
group without the prior approval of the Director, ISD. This also includes a restriction on social
media.
What is not said in this
press release is that all parties involved are influenced by the Wahhabi sect,
just like both radical preachers Zulfikar had contacts with and all the
extremist organisations.
This is Zulfikar, 2nd
person from the right, posing in front of the ISIS flag, with the typical
jihadi pose.
The following are some of
the posts showing Zulfikar’s support for ISIS, his apology for their actions,
his justification for their excesses and his mischievous undermining of
national integrity by promoting a dichotomy between the Muslims and the “kuffar”.
Some of the other posts seems mundane when taken in isolation, but in
the context of his support for ISIS and their global “caliphate”, are
calculated to justify their actions. He
mischievously misquoted religious texts to justify beheadings, and other forms
of oppression by ISIS.
There are also posts, not
all of them here, where Zulfikar attacks Muslims who do not agree with
him. To him, we are “secularists”,
“liberals” and “fake Muslims”; some of us directly named, and some of us
not. It is delicious irony that the very
Religious Rehabilitation Group Zulfikar has attacked is the one that that is
responsible for his rehabilitation and reintegration. I am satisfied that he is put away. There is no place in our society for these
sorts.
Comments
Post a Comment
Thank you for taking the time to share our thoughts. Once approved, your comments will be posted.