Fatwa of Forty-Five Scholars on Visiting the Prophet’s (s.a.w.) Grave
بِسۡمِ ٱللهِ ٱلرَّحۡمَـٰنِ ٱلرَّحِيمِ
A century ago, eleven
major scholars of the Ahl as-Sunnah
in India issued a fatwa on the
lawfulness of travelling with the explicit intention of visiting the Prophet (s.a.w.) in response to the following questions:
What do you say concerning travelling to visit the Prophet (s.a.w.)? Which do you prefer for the traveller at the
time of undertaking travel: to intend to visit the Prophet (s.a.w.), or to intend also to visit the
mosque? For someone said, “One traveling
to Madina must not intend other than the Mosque of the Prophet.”
The reply was reproduced
in full in the book al-Mufannad al-Muhannad,
and Shaykh Muhammad ibn ‘Alawi al-Maliki (q.s.)
again reproduced it recently in his book, Shifa’
al-Fu’ad bi Ziyarat Khayr al-‘Ibad. This
fatwa was subsequently approved and
co-signed by scholars of Makkah, Madina, Egypt, and Syria.
These are the scholars
who signed the fatwa. The scholars from India were Imam Rashid
Ahmad ibn Hidayat Ahmad al-Ghanghahi (r.a.);
Imam Abu Ibrahim Khalil Ahmad ibn Majid ‘Ali Anbahthawi Saharanpuri Muhajir
Madani (r.a.); Shaykh Mahmud al-Hasan
ad-Diwbandi (r.a.); Shaykh Mir Ahmad
Hasan al-Husayni (r.a.); Shaykh ‘Aziz
ar-Rahman ‘Utsmani ad-Diwbandi (r.a.);
Shaykh Muhammad ‘Ali Ashraf at-Tahanawi (r.a.);
Shaykh Shah ‘Abd ar-Rahim ar-Ranfuri (r.a.);
Shaykh al-Hakim Muhammad Hasan ad-Diwbandi (r.a.);
Mawlawi Qudhratullah (r.a.); Shaykh Muhammad
Kifayatullah ibn ‘Inayatullah Shahjahanpuri Dihlawi (r.a.); and Shaykh Muhammad Yahya as-Saharanfuri (r.a.).
The scholars from Makkah
were Shaykh Muhammad Sa’id ibn Muhammad ash-Shafi’i (r.a.), the Chief of the scholars of Makkah and the imam and khathib at the Masjid al-Haram; Shaykh Ahmad Rashid Khan Nawab (r.a.); Shaykh Muhammad ‘Abid ibn Husayn
al-Maliki (r.a.) and Shaykh Muhammad ‘Ali
ibn Husayn al-Maliki (r.a.).
The scholars from Madina
were Sayyid Ahmad ibn Isma’il al-Barzanji (r.a.);
Shaykh Ahmad al-Jaza’iri al-Maliki (r.a.);
Sayyid Muhammad Zaki al-Barzanji (r.a.);
Shaykh ‘Umar ibn Hamdan al-Mahrisi (r.a.);
Sharif Ahmad ibn al-Ma’mun al-Balghits (r.a.);
Shaykh Musa Kazhim (r.a.); Mulla
Muhammad Khan (r.a.); Shaykh Khalil
ibn Ibrahim (r.a.); Shaykh Muhammad
al-‘Aziz al-Wazir at-Tunisi (r.a.); Shaykh
Muhammad as-Susi al-Khayari (r.a.); Shaykh
Ahmad ibn Muhammad Khayr ash-Shanqithi (r.a.);
Shaykh Muhammad ibn ‘Umar al-Fulani (r.a.);
Shaykh Ahmad ibn Ahmad Sa’d (r.a.); Shaykh
Muhammad Manswur ibn Nu’man (r.a.); Shaykh
Ahmad Bisati (r.a.); Shaykh Muhammad
Hasan Sindi (r.a.); and Shaykh Mahmud
‘Abd al-Jawad (r.a.).
The scholars from
al-Azhar were Shaykh al-Azhar Shaykh Salim al-Bashri (r.a.); and Shaykh Muhammad Ibrahim
al-Qayati (r.a.).
The scholars from Syria
were Imam Muhammad Abu al-Khayr ibn ‘Abidin al-Husayni (r.a.); Shaykh Muswthafa ibn Ahmad ash-Shatti al-Hanbali (r.a.); Shaykh Mahmud Rashid al-‘Atstsar
al-Dimashqi (r.a.); Shaykh Muhammad
al-Bushi al-Hamawi (r.a.); Shaykh
Muhammad Sa’id al-Hamawi (r.a.); Shaykh
‘Ali ibn Muhammad al-Dallal al-Hamawi (r.a.);
Shaykh Muhammad Adib al-Hurani (r.a.);
Shaykh ‘Abd al-Qadir al-Lababidi (r.a.);
Shaykh Muhammad Sa’id Luthfi al-Hanafi (r.a.);
Shaykh Faris ibn Ahmad ash-Shaqfa (r.a.);
and Shaykh Muswthafa al-Haddad al-Hamawi (r.a.)
And this is an excerpt of
the text of the fatwa below.
First, let it be known,
before we state our answer, that by Allah’s (s.w.t.) Grace, we, all our shuyukh
and the totality of our assembly are, in the branches of the religion, strict
imitators, muqallidun, of the guide
of mankind and the apex of Muslim scholars, the greatest imam, Imam Abu Hanifah Nu’man ibn Tsabit (r.a.); and, in beliefs and principles of the faith, strict followers,
muttabi’un, of the principal a’immah, Imam Abu al-Hasan ‘Ali ibn Isma’il
al-Ash’ari (r.a.) and Imam Abu
Manswur Muhammad ibn Muhammad al-Maturidi (r.a.);
and that we are strict adherents, muntaswibun,
to the following Sufi ways: the most distinguished way of the Naqshbandi
masters, the most pure way of the Jisti masters, and the most radiant way of
the Suhrawardi masters.
Second, let it be known,
that we do not here speak one word nor utter one syllable concerning the religion
except that we stand upon authority for it with our proof from the Qur’an or sunnah, or the consensus of the ummah, or the sayings of one of the
major scholars of the madzhab. Nevertheless, we do not say that we are exempt
from error and forgetfulness in writing and speaking, therefore, if it becomes
apparent to us that we erred in something, whether in the principles or in the
branches, then we are not ashamed to take it back and proclaim that we do so. How could it not be so when our own a’immah took back many of their
positions, such as the most honorable Imam of Allah’s Sanctuary, our Imam Abu
‘Abdullah Muhammad ibn Idris ash-Shafi’i (r.a.)
until there was little left except he had a new position concerning it? The companions themselves took back some of
their positions in the light of each other's opinions, as is known to those who
pursue the sciences of ahadits. Therefore, if one of our contemporary scholars
asserts that we erred in some ruling, then if concerns the principles let him produce
his evidence in the light of one of the a’immah
of theology, kalam, and if it
concerns the branches, then let him bring forth his evidence from the most
conclusive position of one of the a’immah
of the madzhab. If he so does, then nothing more is left for
us except rightful acceptance with the heart and the tongue, and added to that,
sincere gratitude.
In reply to the question,
according to our shuyukh and us, the
visit to the grave of the Master of Messengers (s.a.w.) is among the greatest of the acts that draw near to Allah (s.w.t.) and those who earn the most
reward and those most efficacious in obtaining a high rank. In fact, it is close to being a required act. This holds true even if its fulfillment comes
by way of travelling and expenditure, and even if one forms the intention, at
the time of departure, to visit the Prophet (s.a.w.) and along with that intention he intends to visit his masjid and other blessed spots and noble
graves.
Moreover, the most appropriate
for him is as the great savant, Shaykh ibn al-Huham (q.s.) said, “Let him devote his intention solely to the visit of
his grave, then he will obtain the visit of his masjid at the time he arrives there, for in so doing he will show
additional reverence and honor to him. This
is according to the narration, ‘Whoever comes to me as a visitor driven by no
other need but my visit, it is incumbent upon me to be his intercessor on the
Day of Resurrection.’”
Imam Shibab ad-Din Abu
al-‘Abbas Ahmad ibn Muhammad ibn Hajr al-Haytsami (r.a.) said in Majmau’ al-Zawa’id
wa Manba’ al-Fawa’id, “ath-Thabarani narrated it in al-Kabir and al-Awsath
from ibn ‘Umar with a chain containing Maslamah ibn Salim and he is weak.”
Imam Zayn ad-Din ibn ‘Abd
al-Rahim al-‘Iraqi (r.a.) said in al-Mughni ‘an Haml al-Aswfar, “ibn as-Sakan
declared the hadits swahih.”
Hence it is reported from
the noble knower of Allah (s.w.t.), Mawlana
‘Abd ar-Rahman Nur ad-Din Muhammad Dashti Jami’ (r.a.) that he set apart the visit from the pilgrimage, and that is
more in keeping with the madzhab of
those who love the Prophet (s.a.w.). As for what the objectors say whereby the
traveller to Madina must not intend other than to visit the noble masjid, on the basis of the hadits, “Mounts are not to be saddled
except to go to three masajid,” then
this is rejected because the hadits does
not indicate an absolute prohibition. Rather,
if one endowed with understanding and learning considers it carefully one sees
a proof in the text for permissibility. The
factor by which the three mosques are excepted from the commonality of mosques
or other places, is the special merit that is attached to them: and that
special merit is present in the noble spot of the grave, for that noble spot and
enlightened expanse of space which contains his limbs is absolutely more
meritorious even than the Ka’bah, the Throne, and the Kursi, as explicitly declared by our fuqaha’. And since the three
mosques have been singled out for their special merit, then it is definitely
the case that the blessed spot of his grave be singled out even more.
Imam Rashid
Ahmad ibn Hidayat Ahmad al-Ghanghahi (r.a.) expounded upon this matter in the same terms that we used, or even more
explicitly, in his treatise Zubdat al-Manasik
fi Fadhl Ziyarat al-Madina al-Munawwarah, which has been printed several
times. Also relevant to this noble issue
is the treatise of the shaykh of our shuyukh, Mawlana Swadr ad-Din ad-Dihlawi
(q.s.) in his treatise, Ahsan al-Maqal fi Hadits la Tushadd ar-Rihal,
which came out in print and became well-known, and in which he unleashed
disaster on the heads of those who call themselves “Salafiyyah.” Let the reader
consult these works. And Allah (s.w.t.)
Knows best.
Comments
Post a Comment
Thank you for taking the time to share our thoughts. Once approved, your comments will be posted.